BASED Prezzo

Name: BASED
SKU: BASED

BASED

#19345

฿0

Limite di mercato

$172,68K

FDV

$172,68K

Volume 24h

$3,48M

Vol/Cap Mercato 24h

2017,67%

Scorta totale

999,999,959

Offerta circolante

Contratti

9pgfS...krB2

Variazione Prezzo

24h

Basso

Alto

Variazione 1h

Variazione 24h

Variazione 7d

Massimo Storico

Minimo Storico

Il prezzo di BASED è $0, giù NaN% nelle ultime 24 ore, e la capitalizzazione di mercato live è $172.680. Ha un'offerta circolante di - BASED monete e un'offerta massima di 999,999,959 BASED insieme a $3,48M volume di trading 24h.

Aggiornamenti del Team

Mappe a Bolle

Prezzo

Limite di mercato

Offerta Disponibile

Swappa

Le Mie Note

Convertitore Crypto

BASED

USD

Partecipazioni

Asset correlati

Criptovalute di tendenza

Asset con il maggior cambiamento nelle visualizzazioni uniche di pagina su CoinStats nelle ultime 24 ore.

Capitalizzazione di mercato simile

Tra tutti gli asset disponibili su CoinStats, questi hanno la capitalizzazione di mercato più simile a BASED.

LayerAI

Alpie

99 Bitcoins

Vanguard Value ETF (Ondo Tokenized)

Buttcoin2026

Brazilian real

GAMER

Global X Uranium ETF (Ondo Tokenized)

Notizie su BASED

6h fa

•

Reddit r/bitcoin

Bitcoin Community Reaches Early Consensus on Quantum Computing Threat, Says Galaxy Digital - Blockonomi

<div class="md"><ul> <li>Galaxy Digital Alex Thorn says Bitcoin holders broadly agree Satoshi’s coins should remain untouched.</li> <li>Satoshi’s BTC spans roughly 22,000 addresses, making a full quantum attack far harder than many assume.</li> <li>Exchanges and active entities can upgrade to post-quantum addresses, reducing their realistic vulnerability. Developers broadly support building post-quantum cryptographic tools now and storing them for future use.</li> </ul> The Bitcoin community is gradually forming a shared view on the risks posed by quantum computing. Alex Thorn, Research Director at Galaxy Digital, shared observations from recent discussions held in Las Vegas. He noted that both skeptics and advocates are beginning to align on key positions. The emerging agreement covers Satoshi Nakamoto’s holdings, post-quantum cryptography development, and how the broader ecosystem should respond. A central point of agreement is that Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin should remain untouched. Thorn noted that interfering with those holdings could seriously damage Bitcoin’s core value proposition around property rights. This position appears to be widely shared across different camps within the community. Thorn also pointed out that the actual risk may be lower than commonly believed. Nakamoto’s coins are spread across roughly 22,000 addresses, each holding 50 BTC. As he noted in a post on X, “a long range attack would have to crack them all,” meaning it is not a single concentrated target. The larger risks, Thorn explained, sit with exchanges and active entities holding large amounts of Bitcoin. However, those parties can upgrade to post-quantum addresses when needed, reducing their vulnerability. This makes them less of a realistic target compared to concerns raised in earlier discussions. Additionally, Thorn referenced the “hourglass proposal” as a potential measure if a long-range quantum attack ever appeared imminent. He also cited data showing that Bitcoin markets have routinely absorbed over one million BTC in sell pressure. Even a sharp drawdown from Satoshi’s coins being cracked would likely be manageable, and most Bitcoin holders would accept that trade-off to preserve property rights. The second area of emerging agreement involves post-quantum cryptographic research. Most people Thorn spoke with agree that developing new cryptographic tools for Bitcoin is a worthwhile effort. The work includes testing, signature compression, and debating how it could eventually be implemented. There are, however, recognized risks with moving too fast. Thorn outlined concerns such as diverting developer resources, introducing untested technology into the protocol, and creating consensus gridlock that could stall other upgrades. These risks make the timeline and approach important factors. A broadly accepted middle ground appears to be developing a post-quantum solution and placing it “on the shelf” for when or if it becomes necessary. This approach allows preparation without forcing premature changes to the protocol. Thorn described this as “unequivocally a good thing” based on his conversations. Thorn closed by noting that even a one percent chance of quantum computing affecting Bitcoin justifies continued work on the issue. He also acknowledged that urgent warnings about the threat have helped push these critical discussions forward within the developer community. </div> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/TheresNoSecondBest"> /u/TheresNoSecondBest </a> <a href="https://blockonomi.com/bitcoin-community-reaches-early-consensus-on-quantum-computing-threat-says-galaxy-digital/">[link]</a> &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1t2eqtk/bitcoin_community_reaches_early_consensus_on/">[comments]</a>

rialzista:

ribassista:

10h fa

•

Reddit r/crytptocurrency

Bots for trading crypto on platforms like Kraken and Gemini - Is it even worth the effort for a Retail trader?

rialzista:

ribassista:

2g fa

•

Reddit r/ethereum

Smart contract based project ideas

rialzista:

ribassista:

2g fa

•

Reddit r/crytptocurrency

I tried 4 different crypto debit cards over 2 years

rialzista:

ribassista:

Disclaimer. Nessuna parte del contenuto che forniamo costituisce un consiglio finanziario sui prezzi delle monete, un consiglio legale o qualsiasi altro tipo di consiglio destinato a essere da te affidabile per qualsiasi scopo. Qualsiasi uso o affidamento sul nostro contenuto è esclusivamente a tuo rischio e discrezione.